Resource: Equipment - Camera photo/video: Celestron microscope USB camera   Event history   Incoming Value Flow
Quantity 1.00 Each
Current Location Sensorica Main Lab
Notes

This is a small USB camera that mounts on the third eye of the inspection microscope.
This camera belongs to Jonathan.

Open operation manual
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IMv2TyDWIbBGaAApoSwkc46DhFSJHkUndYpRoA7BL8c/edit#

Access Rules

Part of the pool of shareables

Photo
Assignments Manager : Jonathan (Contact)
Manager : Tibi (Contact)
Custodian : Jonathan
Record created date May 10, 2013
Record created by None

Where from:

We don't know.

Where to:

  • Event: Celestron microscope USB camera Resource use 1.00 HR Sept. 25, 2014 from: Manipulator - Mantis
  • Event: Celestron microscope USB camera Resource use 5.00 HR April 2, 2014 from: SENSORICA
  • Event: Celestron microscope USB camera Resource use 4.00 HR Oct. 22, 2013 from: SENSORICA
  • Event: Celestron microscope USB camera Resource use 0.70 HR July 31, 2013 from: SENSORICA
    • Process: Fluid level sensor
      • Workers: Work - R&D optics from: Tibi
      • Labnotes:

        03, JUNE 2013
        I discovered this new sensor by playing with the microfiber transducer.
        Ideas were there before from discussions with Frederic about the constriction transducer. Frederic thought that the mechanism of the constriction transducer was leakage, and suggested to plunge it in water to see how the signal changes. The microfilament is a constricted optical fiber on a longer length, so the connection was easy to make, I plunged one microfiber transducer into water and it worked.
        I also tested it to see a difference between water and alcohol, and it worked. I tested saturated salted water, and the signal difference with pure water was too small to make a conclusion.
        I published the results in this video http://youtu.be/oA-0UgrdPBU
        I believe that the working principle is leakage: the fiber is pulled to a smaller core, some light transferred into the cladding, which propagates if the fiber is in air. If the fiber is immersed in a fluid with higher refraction index some light escapes. We're measuring intensity fluctuations. So yes, it depends on the difference between the index of refraction of the cladding and the external media. Nothing out of the ordinary. There is some specific know how for the fabrication of the fiber, which has to be tapered and pulled with a certain geometry, the tip has to be melted to a ball and coated with silver (we're using our in-house low cost silver coating method) to send the light back to the detector.
        I marked some time for documenting the work, communicating to SENSORICA and publishing it on social media.
        I used 125/63.5 MM glass Infinicor300 Corning fiber, pulled with the microsplicer, voltage used 8.5V, max current. I pulled the fiber by hand using the manual micrometers on the device. One can diminish the voltage down to 8V. 7V is not enough to melt the glass fiber. At 8 one can do finer stretches.
        The tip of the pulled micro fiber was melted to round it, and was coated using our inhouse wet silver coating method. Only the very tip was coated. I made 2 devices, 1 to 2 mm long, 40 and 20 microns diameter. Only the 20 microns diameter was sensitive when immersed into water.
        I used the 850nm LED to test it, before it was improved with filter and amplifier.
        TODO: try different diameters. It seems that the critical diameter is between 40 and 20 microns. Also try multiple constrictions to see if we can have a discrete level sensor.

    • Event: Resource Production Prototype - Fluid level sensor 0.70 HR July 31, 2013
  • Event: Celestron microscope USB camera Resource use 1.00 Each July 16, 2013 from: SENSORICA
    • Process: Characterization of the Piezo Micromanipulator
      • Workers: Work - R&D optics from: Tibi
      • Labnotes:

        June 17, 2013
        See documentation in this doc
        https://docs.google.com/document/d/180NuS2Rn6rIUfML0skvjQJAYBXNdBNxFsIZbZXa3HwU/edit#

        The setup was made before, there is another labnote for it.
        http://valnet.webfactional.com/accounting/labnotes/324/

        June 17, 2013
        Continued the work. See the Google doc for more details. Jonathan and Antonio were also involved.
        We discovered that the analog out of the Labjack is limited to steps of 0.02Volts. We need 0.002Volts resolution, in order to test below 0.5um piezo steps. Jonathan will make a circuit for this.

        July 18, 2013
        Continued work on characterization. I am doing long acquisitions for precision tests. These results will be entered in the document in the Precision section.

        August 01, 2013
        Worked with Bing and Antonio on the Piezo. We have a problem with the assembly of the piezo controller. Jonathan made a new prototype and we tested it and it did not work. Frederic's prototype still works fine. We could not clearly understand why the second prototype did not work. The new boards for the product seam to be fine. So the problem is still a mystery.

        August 05, 2013
        Recreated the characterization setup, because Jonathan had taken the piezo driver prototype away for the fabrication. I modified the way the fiber is attached to the piezo stack.

        August 06, 2913
        Resumed characterization experiments. I worked on Precision. See more
        https://docs.google.com/document/d/180NuS2Rn6rIUfML0skvjQJAYBXNdBNxFsIZbZXa3HwU/edit#
        The long-term stability problem prevents us from directly measure precision. I put a note in the doc and sent message to the team about it.
        "This [long-term stability of the Mosquito] is a problem with the acquisition system and with the Mosquito in general that we need to address! We need to improve the architecture of the Mosquito by integrating a reference, which is divided from the signal to account for intensity fluctuations."
        I entered the best data here.
        https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjrQyEif2HItdGJ4TEQxcHdOVzJvdmdHU3lrVUN4OFE#gid=0
        One way around the stability is to measure the difference between 0 Volt and the x Volt, "x" representing an input voltage to the piezo controller, which will result in a motion step.
        Data still needs to be processed.

        Oct 23, 2013,
        tested the 2 axis piezo system, driver and the actuator. Worked with Antonio and Jonathan. Produced the piezo manual
        https://docs.google.com/document/d/18K3m9b_4ah3igcSYuZX4mkTkGPJBSjQVfBVbWE10GC0/edit#

    • Event: Resource Production R&D report 1.00 Each July 16, 2013
  • Event: Celestron microscope USB camera Resource use 6.00 HR June 2, 2013 from: SENSORICA
  • Event: Celestron microscope USB camera Resource use 2.00 HR May 22, 2013 from: SENSORICA
    • Process: Make Photonics - Constriction Transducer
      • Workers: Work - R&D optics from: Tibi
      • Labnotes:

        Worked with Francois on exploring the constriction transducer with the LED 850nm Mosquito.
        See report
        https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aAjJoOfv3M1zt1lPsye8TAxtrE_dlt8lXVRBzGoWAf0/edit#

        May 22
        Worked on the constriction again. I made some experiments to distinguish between my model and Frederic's model of the constriction transducer.
        My model: some light get's transferred into the cladding at the constriction site and after some travel comes back in the core. As it does that, it interferes with the light that continued into the core and the detector sees this interference pattern. I thought that if I coat the entire constricted area and the lever with silver I would increase the sensitivity of the transducer, because more light would come back into the core.
        I made 3 transducers, one with 4 constrictions, one with 2 constrictions and the one with a single constriction. The first two I constricted approx 30%, the last one approx 50%. I connected them to the Chinese LD Mosquito that came back from Phil.
        Through the fluctuations of this Mosquito, because we understand its defaults, I could measure some sensitivity for the 4 constrictions transducer, but not good enough for the other ones. The Mosquito behaves in a strange/unpredictable way.
        I used the reusable optical fiber connectors to connect the fiber.
        In conclusion, it seems that my theory about the mechanism behind the constriction transducer is not the one I thought.
        Pictures and videos were made.

    • Event: Resource Production Prototype Material - Constriction transducer 2.00 HR May 22, 2013